n Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:29 PM Edward Murphy via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > PSS wrote: > > > I've rewritten parts of it in response to the various feedback > > provided. The portion that I have the most concern about is the clause > > that I added to account for change in office holders over time. I > > would also appreciate any other feedback as I would would like this to > > make the next distribution. > > > The Judge of an Indictment is the Arbitor, unless the Arbitor is > > the investigator or perp, in which case the Judge is the Speaker, > > unless the Speaker and the Arbitor are the same person, in which > > case, the Judge is the Prime Minister. > > > > If at any time, the Judge of an Indictment would be the Investigator > > or the perpetrator, the Judge is reassigned according to the previous > > paragraph. > > Seems like that would work fine for changes of office, but what if one > or more of the offices is vacant? Suggested revision: > > The Judge of the Indictment is the first of the following players > who is neither the investigator nor the perp: the Arbitor, the > Speaker, the Prime Minister. If this still fails to specify a > player, then the Indictment lacks a Judge until that changes.
This seems to work to me. Thanks for the continued feedback and assistance!
