On 5/21/20 5:18 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > Not the sort of danger I prefer, it just leads to messes. > > Especially because, the way I'm reading it, the lots must include a single > type of asset if at least one exists. > > Right now we have changed the assets rule so that anything indeterminate > ends up in the L&FD. If any assets passage there is indeterminate, the > uncertainty cascades to the auction (without the Treasuror necessarily > having a choice about excluding the uncertain lots).
The Treasuror would never actually be REQUIRED to initiate an action - the rule says CAN and SHOULD. -- Jason Cobb
