On 5/21/2020 2:12 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:02 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> On 5/21/2020 1:08 PM, nch via agora-business wrote: >>> * all of any single type of asset currently own by the Lost and Found >>> Department, if any. >> >> I'm concerned about allowing the hijacking and auction of literally any >> asset (including contract assets or whatever) that end up in the L&FD. >> >> The reason the L&FD is separate than Agora (i.e. just having stuff end up >> in Agora's possession) is insulation against uncertainty and problems, >> because it takes w/o objection to get things out of there. >> > > Sometimes one needs a bit of excitement to spice things up. This > doesn't feel particularly dangerous?
Not the sort of danger I prefer, it just leads to messes. Especially because, the way I'm reading it, the lots must include a single type of asset if at least one exists. Right now we have changed the assets rule so that anything indeterminate ends up in the L&FD. If any assets passage there is indeterminate, the uncertainty cascades to the auction (without the Treasuror necessarily having a choice about excluding the uncertain lots). -G.
