On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion, <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions: > > 1. In "any player CAN cause this rule to repeal all Emergency > Regulations and then itself." Why do we want the rule to repeal > itself? > Because I wrote it in a hurry and didn't intend it as a general emergency rule. More of a short-term subgame. 2. Should "notwithstanding any rule that would prohibit a single > player from holding both offices." read "any rule that would prohibit > a single player from holding both offices notwithstanding."? > Notwithstanding is ambitransitive. -Alexis >
