On 1/14/2020 9:11 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> On 1/12/2020 1:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> =============================== CFJ 3792 ===============================
>>
>> The above-quoted message contained a valid Promotor's weekly
>> report.
>>
>> ==========================================================================
Crud. I'd done extensive CFJ archive research following Alexis's comments
on this judgement, and meant to self-file a motion to reconsider, but looks
like I forgot and just missed the window. Apologies, Alexis.
FWIW, it comes to the same answer (FALSE). Alexis cited the precedent of
CFJ 3645 as a specific issue against my judgement. CFJ 3645 found, without
much analysis, that publishing a link to information is the same as
publishing the information itself, for the purposes of R2143. But it
ignored the standing precedent, where CFJ 3410 found, on a plain reading of
R2143, that a requirement "publish all such information" means - well - that
you actually need to publish the information.
While CFJ 3645 is more recent, it ignored the standing precedent without
discussion, and is against the plain reading of rules text. So I was going
to opine that, while overruling a precedent can be done, doing so without
discussion (and against the plain language of the rule) meant that CFJ 3645
was an inappropriate judgement and CFJ 3410 should remain the standing
precedent (which removes that as an objection to my current judgement).
There were other useful clarifying precedents (i.e. what constitutes a
"document" and what constitutes a "report"). But this was one of the main
issues that Alexis mentioned so I'd hoped to address that.
https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3410
https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3645
Again, sorry about that!
