On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:58 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 8/18/19 6:54 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Addendum to the above argument: A place we treat it as AGAINST: If 3 > > people call 3 separate CoEs on 3 different line-items in the same > > document (remembering that a CoE places a "doubt" on the document, not > > just the line-item), a single revised report satisfies all of the CoEs > > at once (at least we've always assumed that). > > > > -G. > > Looking at R2201, that seems wrong to me unless the revision explicitly > notes all three claims because of the requirement that the announcement > "clearly cites the claim of error". > > I would assume that replying to the message in which the claim was > created "clearly cites" that claim of error, but that doesn't really > work if there's a bunch.
Oh that's right! Funnily enough, that actually supports my argument a bit better. The "clearly cites the claim of error" text was added just last month (it's not in this version: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2019-July/013016.html). It was specifically added to fix the issue - which shows that in the default case (without such text explicitly spelling out a 1-to-1 matching), we'd assume a single revision did the trick. -G.
