*OH.* Whoops. Yeah, it's good. For some reason (maybe because the number was the same? my error in any case) I was sure that the link was the same as in your previous email; it definitely wasn't though. Yeah, your CoE totally worked.
-Aris On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:58 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The link I pasted was (my attempt at) sending it to the public forum. Is > replying and setting the to address to agora-business not enough? > > Jason Cobb > > On 7/1/19 10:55 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > Roger on the proposal, and again, I'm sorry. It's your CoE that's NttPF. > > > > -Aris > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:52 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It's fine. It's not urgent in light of the judgment on CFJ 3737, so it > >> can just wait. Also, it was submitted to the public forum here [0]. > >> > >> [0]: > >> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-July/040745.html > >> > >> Jason Cobb > >> > >> On 7/1/19 10:48 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > >>> NttPF. > >>> > >>> On the merits, accepted, with my sincere apologies. I could patch this > >>> by submitting a revised distribution now, but then the proposal might > >>> not reach quorum (quorum is 7 ATM, which is pretty high, and people > >>> tend to forget to vote on special distributions). Or I could wait and > >>> put it in the next distribution. Neither is a great option, and I'm > >>> sorry to put you in this situation. I'll do whichever you prefer as > >>> proposal author. > >>> > >>> -Aris > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:09 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Claim of error: I submitted the proposal "Regulated actions reform (v2)" > >>>> here [0]. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [0]: > >>>> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-June/040719.html > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Jason Cobb > >>>> > >>>> On 7/1/19 9:55 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > >>>>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > >>>>> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > >>>>> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the > >>>>> quorum is 7, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid > >>>>> options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are > >>>>> conditional votes). > >>>>> > >>>>> ID Author(s) AI Title > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> 8196 Jason Cobb, Falsifian 1.7 Perfecting pledges (v1.2) > >>>>> 8197 G. none no power is all powerful > >>>>> 8198 Jason Cobb 1.0 Be gone, foul demon! > >>>>> 8199 Jason Cobb 3.0 Fixing instant runoff > >>>>> 8200 Aris, G. 3.0 Sane AI Defaulting > >>>>> 8201 Aris 3.0 Just Make Them Write It Out > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> The proposal pool is currently empty. > >>>>> > >>>>> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. > >>>>> > >>>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>>>> ID: 8196 > >>>>> Title: Perfecting pledges (v1.2) > >>>>> Adoption index: 1.7 > >>>>> Author: Jason Cobb > >>>>> Co-authors: Falsifian > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> [Comment: This clarifies the wording to explicitly use both the time > >>>>> window and penalty specified in the Oath. This also specifies that > >>>>> pledges can only be violated once.] > >>>>> > >>>>> Amend the first paragraph of Rule 2450 ("Pledges") to read: > >>>>> > >>>>> If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform (or > >>>>> refrain from performing) certain actions, then breaking the pledge > >>>>> within the pledge's time window is the Class N crime of > >>>>> Oathbreaking. If the pledge specifically states that the pledge is > >>>>> under penalty of a Class A crime, where A is an integer not less > >>>>> than 1, then N is A; otherwise, N is 2. If the pledge specifically > >>>>> states that it operates only for a certain time window, and if that > >>>>> time window is prospective and not retrospective, then it operates > >>>>> only for that time window; otherwise, the pledge operates for 60 > >>>>> days. It is impossible to commit the crime of Oathbreaking multiple > >>>>> times for a single pledge; breaking a single pledge multiple times > >>>>> constitutes a single crime. > >>>>> > >>>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>>>> ID: 8197 > >>>>> Title: no power is all powerful > >>>>> Adoption index: none > >>>>> Author: G. > >>>>> Co-authors: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Create the following Rule, "Supreme Power", Power=4: > >>>>> > >>>>> G. CAN make arbitrary changes to the gamestate by announcement. > >>>>> > >>>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>>>> ID: 8198 > >>>>> Title: Be gone, foul demon! > >>>>> Adoption index: 1.0 > >>>>> Author: Jason Cobb > >>>>> Co-authors: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Repeal Rule 2596 ("The Ritual"). > >>>>> > >>>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>>>> ID: 8199 > >>>>> Title: Fixing instant runoff > >>>>> Adoption index: 3.0 > >>>>> Author: Jason Cobb > >>>>> Co-authors: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Amend item 3 of the only list of Rule 2528 ("Voting Methods") to read: > >>>>> > >>>>> 3. For an instant runoff decision, non-empty ordered lists for > >>>>> which > >>>>> each element is a valid option. > >>>>> > >>>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>>>> ID: 8200 > >>>>> Title: Sane AI Defaulting > >>>>> Adoption index: 3.0 > >>>>> Author: Aris > >>>>> Co-authors: G. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Amend Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption Indices) by replacing: > >>>>> Adoption index is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran > >>>>> decisions and proposals, whose value is either "none" (default) or > >>>>> an integral multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9. > >>>>> with: > >>>>> Adoption index (AI) is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran > >>>>> decisions and proposals. For decisions, the possible values are > >>>>> "none" (default) or integral multiples of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9. > >>>>> For proposals, the possible values are integral multiples of 0.1 > >>>>> from 1.0 to 9.9 (default 1.0). > >>>>> > >>>>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>>>> ID: 8201 > >>>>> Title: Just Make Them Write It Out > >>>>> Adoption index: 3.0 > >>>>> Author: Aris > >>>>> Co-authors: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> [It's terribly confusing for everyone to leave out a proposal title. > >>>>> Leaving > >>>>> out AI only works if it's 1.0 anyway, and confuses me every time I see > >>>>> it. > >>>>> I usually spend like a solid minute checking that I haven't missed > >>>>> something > >>>>> as Promotor and that the proposal is effective at that power as a > >>>>> player. > >>>>> Just making these fields mandatory would save everyone so much trouble > >>>>> and > >>>>> be only marginally more work for authors.] > >>>>> > >>>>> Amend Rule 2350, "Proposals", by changing the first paragraph, including > >>>>> the following list, to read in full: > >>>>> > >>>>> A proposal is an entity consisting of a body of text and > >>>>> other attributes. A player CAN create a proposal by announcement, > >>>>> specifying its text, an associated title, and a valid adoption > >>>>> index, and > >>>>> optionally specifying a list of co-authors (who must be persons > >>>>> other > >>>>> than the author). > >>>>> > >>>>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
