> On Jan 2, 2019, at 1:19 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
>
> However if you really feel strongly about this one I'm open to
> reclassification if there's a consensus - to me it seemed that the added
> "rule then-make announcement a week later" seemed to be a fairly minor
> part of the process when (as per the CFJ) the winning set was primarily
> determined by the voting pattern, but YMMV.
I don’t feel strongly at all. This outcome seems reasonable enough. Just wanted
to confirm that that was in fact the reasoning, rather than an unintentional
oversight.
