On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 08:20 -0800, Gaelan Steele wrote: > Is there any reason we’d want proposals resolved out of order? I > don’t see any off hand, but it’s worth making sure we’re not losing > the ability to easily clean up some mess.
It could potentially work as a counterscam, but if we need to do this in an emergency, we could just have the Assessor resign and then have someone deputise to resolve them in the required order. Come to think of it, the pledge being requested here could be worked around via resigning Assessor (ending the pledge) then immediately deputising yourself to resolve the proposals out of order. -- ais523
