On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 04:32 +0100, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: > > Would anyone like me to start publishing Rulekeepor's notes? It's > > an old tradition but I'm not going to do it if people don't think > > it would be useful. > > > > If you *do* want me to publish them, tell me what information you > > would like me to include. > > As I recall, the most interesting information in those were when the > Rulekeepor pointed out that a Proposal had not worked as intended.
In general, Rulekeepor's notes should likely just contain information on effects of passing a proposal that are not obvious from the proposal text. Things like "the rule that the proposal tries to amend doesn't exist" are needed to make sense of the effect the proposal had on the gamestate. The notes wouldn't be necessary in cases where the proposals actually do what it looks like from their text that they dod. -- ais523
