On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 8:05 PM Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2018 08:34 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:> ID    Author(s)
> AI    Title
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 8123  Gaelan              3.0   Independence
> FOR
> > 8124  Trigon              1.0   Only proposals should be distributed
> FOR
> > 8125  Trigon              3.0   Time periods are confusing
> FOR, though I'm sure there's a better way I could've written this.
> > 8126  Trigon              3.0   High-level asset verbs
> FOR
> > 8127  Trigon              2.0   Reinstituting Rewards
> FOR
> > 8128  twg                 2.0   [1]
> PRESENT. I don't know what to think about it.
> > 8129  twg, Trigon, G.     3.0   Bugfix: Treasuror doesn't self-ratify v2
> FOR. I think this works fine.
> > 8130  Gaelan              2.0   Law is Ambiguous Word Act
> FOR
> > 8131  天火狐, twg          2.0   V.J. Rada Protection Act
> FOR
> > 8132  Aris                1.0   Website Ruleset Update Petition
> AGAINST. I actually did update the website so it supports an FLR that is
> up-to-date with the SLR because of a conversation between Aris and me
> the other day. But I really just feel like this being a proposal is a
> strange choice.

TBH, I think I just misread one of your messages. You said "Draft a
proposal; Agora shall decide". I thought you were talking about this;
rereading, I think you were talking about making the FLR weekly.

-Aris

Reply via email to