Retracting doesn't un-pend it, it removes it from the proposal pool. See rule 2350, the last paragraph:
"The author of a proposal in the Proposal Pool CAN remove (syn. retract, withdraw) it from the Pool by announcement." On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 00:17 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: > Pending’s gone, so can you retract? > > Gaelan > > > On Oct 31, 2018, at 10:41 PM, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Right you are, Ørjan. I retract the two proposals I have most recently > submitted and instead submit the following two: > > > > ----- > > Title: Only proposals should be distributed > > AI: 1 > > Author: Trigon > > Coauthors: > > > > [ COMMENT: This was pretty useless back in the day and it still is. If > > someone decides they need this mechanic for anything, just reenact > > it. ] > > > > Repeal Rule 2515 "Distributing Assets". > > > > ----- > > Title: Time periods are confusing > > AI: 3 > > Author: Trigon > > Coauthors: > > > > [ COMMENT: The current way is a really roundabout way of doing it, in my > > opinion. I'm not sure if this is any better, to be honest, but > > I think it has some merit. ] > > > > Amend Rule 1728 "Dependent Actions" by: > > replacing the following: > > 2. If the action is to be performed Without N Objections, With N > > Agoran Consent, or With Notice, if the intent was announced at > > least 4 days earlier > > > > 3. If the action is to be performed With T Notice, if the intent > > was announced at least T earlier. > > with: > > 2. The intent was announced at least T earlier. If T is undefined, > > it is instead considered to be 4 days if the action is not With > > N Support; otherwise 0 days. > > and by renumbering the list accordingly. > > > >> On 10/31/2018 07:42 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > >>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: > >>> Repeal Rule 2505 "Distributing Assets". > >> That should be 2515. > >>> Amend Rule 1728 "Dependent Actions" by: > >>> replacing the following: > >>> 2. If the action is to be performed Without N Objections, With N > >>> Agoran Consent, or With Notice, if the intent was announced at > >>> least 4 days earlier > >>> > >>> 3. If the action is to be performed With T Notice, if the intent > >>> was announced at least T earlier. > >>> with: > >>> 2. The intent was announced at least T earlier. If T is > undefined, > >>> it is instead considered to be 4 days. > >>> and by renumbering the list accordingly. > >> Currently there is no delay for With N Support. > >> Greetings, > >> Ørjan. > > > > -- > > Trigon > >
