While With Notice is a dependent action, demanding resignation is NOT with
notice: (2472/2)
If a player is Overpowered, any player CAN Demand Resignation from
em by announcement, provided e has announced intent do to so
between four and fourteen days earlier. The Overpowered player is
then removed from all offices.
While it’s functionally similar to With Notice, it’s not—it’s just by
announcement with a condition.
Gaelan
> On Oct 28, 2018, at 3:31 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> To the contrary, it is a dependent action—dependent on notice. The Agoran
> Satisfaction rule does not limit objections to any particular types of
> dependent actions. Instead, under the Agoran Satisfaction rule:
>
> “An Objector to a dependent action is an eligible entity who has
> publicly posted (and not withdrawn) *an objection to the announcement of
> intent to perform the action.*”
>
> Then these provisions govern whether Agora is satisfied with your intent:
>
> “4. if the action is to be performed With Notice or With T
> Notice. . . . The above notwithstanding, Agora is not satisfied with
> the intent if the Speaker has objected to it in the last 48 hours.”
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 6:24 PM Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, October 28, 2018 10:18 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So here’s the scam—I think that nothing prevents me from objecting to
>> this
>>> intent multiple times, every 48 hours, and thereby preventing Agora from
>>> ever becoming satisfied with it.
>>
>> Yes there is, which is that Demanding Resignation is _not_ a Dependent
>> Action, for this precise reason. Attempts to support or object to it are
>> INEFFECTIVE.
>>
>> To be sure, you have limited dictator-like powers for the next 96 hours.
>> But that's all it is. Sorry.
>>
>> -twg
>>
> --
> D. Margaux
