On Sun, 2018-10-28 at 18:18 -0400, D. Margaux wrote: > To be sure, a player who has *withdrawn* an objection cannot object again > (“A person CANNOT support or object to an announcement of intent .. after > e has withdrawn the same type of response.”). I suppose that is to prevent > someone from executing a subterfuge of withdrawing and then reinstating a > response (I think).
It's to prevent someone repeatedly objecting and withdrawing the objection to make the intent impossible to resolve, as you can't resolve an intent shortly after an objection was withdrawn. (The reason for /that/ is to stop people forcing through without-objection actions via objecting to them, making people think they were already "dealt with" and thus causing them not to bother adding their own objections, then withdrawing the objections just before the resolution. That was a fun scam while it lasted.) -- ais523
