Re: DIS: Fwd: OFF: [Treasuror] Weekly report: Last ever painstaking addition of 3s to each facility balance

[Kerim Aydin]

On Sat, 20 Oct 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 
> > You can still use ratification, just be specific on date/time, e.g.
> > 
> > The following document is hereby ratified:
> > {
> >  On 18-Oct-2018, HH:MM:SS [time of Treasuror's Report],
> >  G. had 42 coins and D. Margaux had 62 coins.
> > }
> 
> Um, that's precisely the kind of document I claim is fishy to ratify.

And honestly, we've done it before (or at least claimed to do so)
and I really still don't see the issue for it.  Can you construct
an example where this causes problems?