Good attempt at a scam. I had already anticipated it, however, and I think you 
will find you'd rather have submitted to the currency revaluation.

If anyone spots the booby-trap, please don't point it out. I want the delicious 
satisfaction of seeing their reactions when it activates. c:

-twg


‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, September 30, 2018 11:05 PM, D Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The text of the contract between me and G. is provided at bottom of this
> email.
>
> I transfer 30 coins to nichdel.
>
> I transfer all of my coins to the contract below between me and G.
>
> I cause nichdel to transfer 30 coins to me.
>
> I CFJ (barring Aris) this statement: “D. Margaux’s attempt in this message
> to transfer coins to the contract between em and G. is EFFECTIVE.” (I note
> for the Arbitor’s benefit that G. is an interested party. Also twg might be
> considered an interested party because this transfer circumvents the
> “according to eir means” proposals that e authored.)
>
> If my attempt to transfer coins to the contract between me and G. was
> INEFFECTIVE, then I change my vote and cause nichdel to change eir vote on
> 8081B* to FOR.
>
> ///// Contract between D. Margaux and G. /////
>
> 1.  This is a contract between D. Margaux and G. (the “parties”). Other
>     players CANNOT join this contract without consent of both parties. This
>     contract CAN be terminated by consent of both parties.
>
> 2.  The name of this contract is the “First Bank of Agora.”
> 3.  A party to this contract has “on deposit in the contract” an amount of
>     coins equal to the total number of coins e has deposited in this contract,
>     minus the total number of coins e has withdrawn from the contract.
>
> 4.  Any party to this contract CAN transfer coins to this contract. Making
>     such a transfer is called “depositing” those coins in the contract.
>
> 5.  Any party to this contract CAN cause the contract to transfer to em any
>     amount of coins less than or equal to the number of coins e has on deposit
>     in the contract. Making such a transfer is called “withdrawing” the coins
>     from the contract.
>
>     ///// end of contract /////
>
>     On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 7:12 PM Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
>
>
> > I agree to the exchanged Contract with this hash. -G.
> > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> >
> > > G. and I have exchanged a document that has text with the following
>
> SHA256
>
> > > hash:
> > > 58629980096A5E997EC5CF62C04B59EBFBEEAF81DD4785B50CCF190E1F24CE2D
> > > I agree to be bound by that text and I agree and consent for that text
>
> to
>
> > > be a contract between me and G., if G. likewise agrees.


Reply via email to