forwarded to FRC as a theme suggestion. As I said, they're between rounds. On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 4:24 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 29 Jun 2018, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 14:09 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > But more to the point maybe this theme would end up as graybeard-only > > > which wasn't my intent (but that was great addition to the previous > > > memoirs Dave!) - I was thinking entries would be as much about judicial > > > procedure as the actual arguments, e.g. "your honor, the next Rule must > > > move to strike the evidence presented in a previous rule" and that > kind > > > of thing. Maybe the theme needs tweaking? > > > > I'd much prefer this to be entirely "in-character" and not refer to the > > fantasy rules themselves. Something as simple as "I move to strike the > > evidence. Here are my reasons:" and leaving someone else to finish the > > sentence would achieve the same thing as your example in a much more > > flavourful way. > > Very good point! > > How about just "Oyez Oyez Oyez!!!" as a theme and let the court case > develop freeform from that? (with special thanks to PSS for eir excellent > judgements this week). > > > > -- "At this point, given the limited available data, certainty about only a very small number of things can be achieved." -- Plato, and others
