It's "without objection" anyway, so if someone tried to actually do harm
with it, someone could just object.
On 6/21/2018 12:54 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Nope, although they used to be. The rule cleanup rule was reverted to
an earlier form by Proposal 8000 (technically, the new one was
repealed and the old one reenacted). In my book, this side effect is
really a good thing. This is easily one of the most common types of
errors that needs to be fixed.
-ArisOn Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:41 PM Ned Strange
<edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote:
aren't people specifically banned from changing rules to all caps or
from them in this way
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Despite this being a meaningful semantic change, it's also a blatantly
obvious typo fix. Without objection, I intend to change the text
"SHALL" to "shall" in Rule 2515, "Distributing Assets".
-Aris
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:25 PM Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Without objection, I do so.
-Aris
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:51 PM Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Without objection, I intend to change the text "statment" to
"statement" in Rule 2471, "No Faking".
-Aris
--
From V.J. Rada
