Looks great. This gives me some ideas on how to do that regulations reform that I've been thinking about. I'm still planning to work on it, and I should have time for it in June.
-Aris On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > I submit the following proposal, Pledge Simplification, AI-1.7: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [The Asset-nature of pledges is complicated and serves no purpose; > if pledges are to be used for out-of-Agora agreements, the Agoran > Consent constraint makes no sense as it's not a voting matter]. > > Amend Rule 2450 (Pledges) to read in full: > > If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform > (or refrain from performing) certain actions, then breaking the > pledge within the pledge's time window is the Class N crime of > Oathbreaking, where N is 2 unless the pledge explicitly states > otherwise. The time window of a pledge is 60 days, unless > the pledge explicitly states otherwise. > > If breaking the pledge harms specific other parties, the Referee > SHOULD solicit the opinion of those parties in determining an > appropriate fine. > > The Notary's Weekly Report includes a copy of all pledges that > are within their time window, and the dates the pledges were > made. > > All pledges that existed as assets the instant before this Proposal > took effect are considered to have been made as pledges under the > current version of Rule 2450. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >
