If we're going with the penalties transfer option, it probably makes sense to say somewhere that the class of crime committed is equal to the one that the person acted on behalf of was induced to commit.
-Aris On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:15 AM Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The thing about using the "is allowed to" language instead of CAN is > that it triggers the whole method in R2466, that includes a CAN, > specifies how to do it, and includes legal consequences. > Putting a CAN here without all that language doesn't have a method > (by announcement or what?) or explain the complicated legal > consequences. Either stick with "is allowed to" here, or clarify > R2466. > > This also fails to make a consequence to Masters for illegal behavior, > so I would vote against it on those grounds. > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote: > > I create the following proposal. > > > > Title: Clearer & Better Zombies > > AI: 2.0 > > Text: In rule 2532, Zombies, replace the text "A zombie's master, if > > another player, is allowed to act on behalf of the zombie (i.e. as the > > zombie's agent) to perform LEGAL actions." with "A zombie's master, if > > another player, CAN act on behalf of the zombie to perform actions" > > > > > > -- > > From V.J. Rada > > > >
