If that's true in general, then people aren't culpable for contracts that allow others to break the rules on their behalf. I don't really think that's fair,
-Aris On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:44 AM Corona <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps there should be something explicitly saying that one is not > responsible (for the purposes of punishing ILLEGAL actions) for actions > taken on one's behalf, but the party acting on behalf of em is? > > On Friday, April 20, 2018, Ned Strange <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I create the following proposal. > > > > Title: Clearer & Better Zombies > > AI: 2.0 > > Text: In rule 2532, Zombies, replace the text "A zombie's master, if > > another player, is allowed to act on behalf of the zombie (i.e. as the > > zombie's agent) to perform LEGAL actions." with "A zombie's master, if > > another player, CAN act on behalf of the zombie to perform actions" > > > > > > -- > > From V.J. Rada > > > > > -- > > ~Corona >
