We all already get 2 paper a month, so I'm worried about reintroducing without objection and making mills worthless.
I'm gonna try and write a contract to coordinate the altruism but I don't know if it'll work. On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > That is v. annoying. I'm not feeling altruistic (I mean I might once, but > not against an ongoing defect in the rules) - I wonder how if people will > pay for bugfixes? Anyway, I don't plan to pay to pend it - not asking > anyone > else to but feel free if you like :P > > On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, Kenyon Prater wrote: > > PAoaM amends 2445 by removing Without Objection as a method of pending a > > proposal. Want me to pend it with paper? > > > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I submit the following proposal, Paydays Fix, AI-2. > > > > > > I intend to pend it without objection (plenty of time before the next > > > payday). > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Amend Rule 2559 (Paydays) by replacing the text: > > > e was not issued any Cards other than Green for eir conduct > > > in that office > > > with: > > > no unforgivable fines were levied on em for eir conduct in that > > > office > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > >
