On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 at 19:52 Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Here are my preliminary interpretations as Rulekeepor: > Create a new rule "Paydays" (Power=2) and amend it so that its text > > reads, in full: > > This is written as if it were two rule changes, but doesn't specify the > original text before amendment. > I'm interpreting this as failing because it is ambiguous as to the text of the rule when created, and interpreting it as creating a rule with the specified text is not a reasonable way to interpret it. > > > Re-enact rule 1996/3 (Power=1), renaming it to "The Cartographor" with > > the text: > > How many rule changes is this, and what is their order? > Per Rule 105, re-enactment is permitted to amend a rule. It does not allow for retitling a rule as part of re-enactment. Therefore I'm treating this as failing as well. > > > Re-enact rule 2022/5 (Power=1), renaming it "Land Transfiguration" with > > the text: > > Ditto. > Ditto. > > > Replace all occurances of "shiny" and "shinies" in the ruleset with > > "coin" and "coins" respectively in ascending numerical order. > > Rule 2166 seems to have too high power for this, although it might > therefore be considered a bug that it mentions shinies at all. > Indeed. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. >
