I think R217 should say that every person CAN always call 2 CFJs free per week, no matter what. And get rid of AP.
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 01:07 +0000, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Another argument in favour of making CFJ calls less fundamentally > > conditional. > > Perhaps we should pragmatise CFJs? If you call them, they always go > through unless explicitly refused by the Arbitor for not having > payment. > > This would allow "public interest" CFJs to be called for free, too, so > long as the Arbitor was on board. > > -- > ais523 >
