black card? that's the only remedy, although the referee is free to not card.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes I was just doing the sums of AP and shinies and realizing same. > > Well if a non-player wants to take this route I'm game to do the Officing. > Will raise an interesting question on what happens if a non-player > unequivocally breaks a rule ("A person SHALL NOT initiate an excess case.") > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: >> Ahh, hmm, I think that might work provided we can get a non-player to call >> sufficient CFJs. Given the volume we couldn't do it with Shinies alone. >> >> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 15:34 Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: >> > > Thus, I think the correct solution here is to have another officer issue >> > > illegal favours to a number of people, each of whom influences >> > politicians >> > > sufficiently such that V.J. Rada cannot become an advisor, and agrees not >> > > to use eir power. Then we pass a proposal absolving the officer of >> > > responsibility. >> > >> > If some people call a bunch of CFJs (on trivial matters), and others favor >> > them, and I assign them and they judge, and I award, can we get sufficient >> > judicial favours spread around to counteract, entirely legally? (if we >> > don't hit the Excess limit). >> > >> > Further if judges file Motions after judging and then re-judge, they >> > can be awarded twice. If then the group-file option is used with a gang >> > of three conspirators, three times. (I'm actually amazed no one has used >> > Motions to double their judicial rewards so far, but I guess the rewards >> > are low in normal circumstances). >> > >> > Sorry I haven't worked through the win mechanism to know if this works, I >> > just noticed I could award favors for CFJs. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >From V.J. Rada
