Ah, I suppose it would ve rude of me not to introduce myself; my (nick)name is Corona, and I've been reading the rules & mail for a while.
On 11/17/17, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, is CFJ 3558 "V.J Rada is a Player" still relevant, or has some > rule change since then made it impossible to register immediately > after deregistering using the method V.J Rada did? I didn't want to > CFJ this, as it would presumably take longer to be answered that way. > --- > Relevant case: > > ============================== CFJ 3558 ============================== > VJ Rada is a player. > ======================================================================== > Caller: V.J. Rada Judge: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Judgement: > TRUE > ======================================================================== > History: Called by V.J. Rada: 06 Sep 2017 Assigned to Publius > Scribonius Scholasticus: 06 Sep 2017 Judged TRUE by Publius Scribonius > Scholasticus: 14 Sep 2017 > ======================================================================== > Caller's Arguments: The questions raised are 1: Under the strange > registration precedents, you can get away with registering with some > strange messages. However, "CFJ: I'm a player" w/out more and "Jeff iz > hare" are not enough. Which side of the line does my message fall in? > 2: The rules state that there is a 30 day time limit before > registering "by announcement" and define "by announcement". Does my > message, which is likely outside of that definition, allow me to skip > the time limit (having last deregistered on 11 August)? > ======================================================================== > Caller's Evidence: On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:00 AM, V.J Rada wrote: >> i wish 2 do da playery-playery stuff like da agencies and da votin' >> and da ownin' of da money n' all that. i now change my status 2 be >> able to do all dat stuff. >> >> -- >> From V.J Rada > > ======================================================================== > > Judge's Arguments: > > I judge this TRUE because VJ Rada failed to make eir registration > unambiguous and clear and therefore it was not by announcement and > therefore no restrictions were triggered. I will add that the message > alone would have been ineffective in causing eir registration and a key > element in eir registration was eir taking of actions as if e were a > player. >
