yeah no not blaming you specifically and you're right but this is a nomic for fun right? we have the economy for a fun game. and like... even if there's not a whole bunch of things to buy from Agora we do have contracts now, we have game mechanics. the solution isn't always fixing the rules (not that they don't need to be fixed) it's like...we're expecting new rules to change our behaviours whereas i feel like we'd have more spending if we just...spent more. and like, obviously i haven't been spending more than y'all or anything, i did have a contract idea but not sure if it would be well received.
idk maybe we should just abolish money: it's only really around for the sake of it rn, nobody's being benefited by having more money, even someone with like 15 shinies and one office can call as many cfjs as they want for weeks, make infinite proposals. we could just go all out on this land stuff. land gives you different benefits, you claim land by doing work for it or satisfying different conditions, offices come with land not money. whoever has the most land wins. then re-invent money after if we have to because people want to buy and sell land. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. > > On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 at 21:11 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The main problem with the economy is not that I am acting rationally > > based off of the parameters. It is that as it stands, I have no use or > > reason to spend my money. > > > > On 11/16/2017 09:08 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > > this is actually the main problem with the economy btw > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> I will take Arbitor, if no one wants it, but I will not do so > happily. I > > >> agree with the sentiment and I plan to disengage from the economy and > > >> hoarde shinies until it is fixed. > > >> > > >> On 11/16/2017 09:03 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > >>> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 at 20:56 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > >>>>> None of these succeeded, as Agora only had 40 sh. by the time > Alexis > > >>>>> tried it. However, I think G. has a good point. With that in mind: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> * I pay Alexis 29 > > >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Alexis+29&entry=gmail&source=g>sh. > > >>>>> * I pay ATmunn 2 > > >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=ay+ATmunn+2&entry=gmail&source=g>9 sh. > > >>>>> * I pay G. < > > https://maps.google.com/?q=*+I+pay+G.&entry=gmail&source=g > > >>>> 29 sh. > > >>>>> * I pay Publius Scribonius Scholastic > > >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Scholastic&entry=gmail&source=g>us 29 > sh. > > >>>> > > >>>> I pay o 29 sh. > > >>>> > > >>>> I resign Herald. > > >>>> I'll catch up Arbitor before I resign that one. > > >>>> > > >>>> I flip my emotion to melancholy. > > >>>> > > >>>> This economy has been a hot mess for far too long. I don't do > offices > > >>>> for a reward in general, but it's extremely dispiriting to be on > this > > >>>> ride at this point and expect to get ahead. Donations don't > > >> particularly > > >>>> help that feeling, though thanks for the offer. > > >>>> > > >>> Hear, hear. > > >>> > > >>> I won't be resigning, though; we need a rulekeepor and it's fun, and > > >> tailor > > >>> is pretty trivial. > > >> -- > > >> ---- > > >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > ---- > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > > > > > -- >From V.J. Rada
