"(I mean, I'm perfectly ready to go with the interpretation that it works for you, but it also works for everything else and I can pay a 2 Shiny Pend fee by paying 1 shiny now and 1 in a week or something. That's why I was looking for the definitions that I thought we clarified but maybe never did)."
I wouldn't say that's true either. The pend wording is this: "Any player CAN flip a specified proposal's imminence to "pending" by announcement BY: b) spending the current Pend Cost in shinies.". Clearly the word by makes it required to be simultaneous: the Pend Cost must be paid at the same time as the announcement. The Estate Auction wording is: "The winner CAN cause Agora to transfer the auctioned Estate to emself by announcement, IF E PAYS Agora the amount of the bid". That's readable and should be read as non-simultaneous: that is, the winner can get the estate if e has paid Agora the amount of the winning bid in shinies for the single and sole purpose of winning the Estate. On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> To be clear, I would look back at those recent precedents (I don't offhand >> remember which cases or payments) to find the reasons for those judgements >> before coming to a conclusion on this one. Both can't be right. > > (I mean, I'm perfectly ready to go with the interpretation that it works for > you, but it also works for everything else and I can pay a 2 Shiny Pend fee > by paying 1 shiny now and 1 in a week or something. That's why I was looking > for the definitions that I thought we clarified but maybe never did). > > > -- >From V.J. Rada
