Sorry for being "super-informal Rada" this week. On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:40 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I revoke the below proposal. > > Even more classic. > > Ayyyy don't insta-pend things lads. > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> >>> On Nov 7, 2017, at 4:18 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> god's SAKE classic Rada proposing skills. >>> >>> I create and pend the following proposal with shinies >>> >>> Title: Another Obvious Fix >>> AI: 2 >>> Text: Delete from rule 2487 the text "When the Supply level Changes, a >>> Shiny Releveling event occurs.” >> >> I’m not so convinced that this is a fix. >> >> Registrations and deregistrations are rare events. From a pure data tracking >> point of view, they’re not that much of a hassle to include in the >> Treasuror’s report. >> >> Automatically creating 70 sh. when someone registers makes it very, very >> likely that Agora can afford to pay eir welcome package. >> >> The biggest issue, honestly, is the question of what happens when someone >> deregisters when Agora has fewer than 70 sh. in its coffers. That’s fixable; >> I suspect that destroying as many Shinies as possible, up to a maximum of >> the number needed to bring the total of all balances to the Shiny Supply >> Level, would work. Loosening the Treasuror’s obligation to “as part of eir >> monthly duties” without the constraint that it happen in the first week >> would allow the Treasuror to “catch up” Agora’s excess shinies in most cases. >> >> -o >> > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada
-- >From V.J. Rada
