It's a race between Alexis & G. both need just one more ribbon to win the
game.

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Madeline <[email protected]> wrote:

> I vote FOR for this proposal.
>
> As soon as I saw this I thought "wait can't someone scam Cyan through
> expediting whatever proposal" and then you immediately used it for
> Transparent!
>
>
>
> On 2017-11-06 14:11, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 22:10 Alexis Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I submit, pend for an AP, and expedite by specially deputiising, per Rule
>> 2443, for Promotor distribute the following Proposal. This notice thus
>> initiates the Agoran decision to adopt the Proposal; the valid votes are
>> FOR, AGAINST, PRESENT, and conditional votes, the vote collector is the
>> Assessor.
>>
>> Proposal: Rulekeepor History Fix (AI=1, author=Alexis)
>> {{{
>> Amend rule 1681 (The Logical Rulesets) by replacing "any historical
>> annotations which the Rulekeepor is required to record" with "any required
>> historical annotations, to the greatest extent that such information is
>> available" and by replacing "Whenever a rule is changed in any way, the
>> Rulekeepor SHALL record a historical annotation to the rule indicating:"
>> with "The required historical annotations are, for every time a rule has
>> been changed in any way, a historical annotation to that rule including:"
>> }}}
>>
>> This existing rule is unclear as to what actually is required; this makes
>> it more clear and additionally excuses the Rulekeepor early history where
>> the information is not available.
>>
>> -Alexis
>>
>
> I award myself a Transparent Ribbon: I qualify for Cyan per the above,
> Green for Tailor, Indigo for my thesis, and Red and Orange for Proposal
> 7940.
>
> -Alexis
>
>


-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to