I'm not really sure what is meant by the first question.
On 10/26/2017 9:34 PM, Josh T wrote:
For the purposes to provide everyone involved with a fun game, I would like to ask those interested to partake in a voluntary anonymous survey so I have an idea of what people are expecting. I will probably be making word/phrase lists on Saturday after I resolve my intent to amend the contract so that it is usable and pull / update that list as people make or concede the wager. The survey can be found here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf1aKvKLkD-kzBPrgBJaRyl32nA028tjNlZXNCKvu35Vw5E8Q/viewform 天火狐 On 26 October 2017 at 00:25, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com <mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote: I become a party to the Order On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com <mailto:draconicdarkn...@gmail.com>> wrote: > NttPF. > > I posted the intent to amend. I'm heading to bed though, so if I missed > things let me know and I'll amend to fix it ASAP. > > 天火狐 > > On 26 October 2017 at 00:19, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com <mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I become a party to the Order. >> >> I will wager if you change the party/participant thing. >> >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com <mailto:nich...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > I become a party of Order of the Occult Hand. I like the idea >> > tremendously but there's two qualms: >> > >> > * Party and participant are used interchangeably when they are in fact >> > not. Party includes the proprietor, participant does not. This leads, >> > either intentionally or accidentally, to the bigger issue: >> > >> > * The proprietor appears to be able to look for the occult hand, >> > potentially making this a giant scam. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> From V.J. Rada > > -- From V.J. Rada
