Surely so! I strongly remember resolving that batch, it was a huge one. On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > Depitizing for rulekeepor entails taking the office over (unless you resign > after of course). I think we'd all appreciate the short term work but it's > one of the hardest jobs to do on an ongoing basis. > > That said, was the last election ever resolved? I see VJ initiated it on > September 14 but can't find the resolution. > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017, 15:57 Reuben Staley, <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> (Oh gosh. What have I gotten myself into?) >> >> I don't understand the significance of your message. What should I wait >> to do? Do you mean I shouldn't work on the ruleset? >> >> On 10/22/2017 1:50 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> > Not you specifically, primarily Trigon, but really anyone who wanted it. >> > >> > >> > On 10/22/2017 03:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> >> (was this meant to be just to me?) I'm not planning on doing anything >> >> myself to start an election or anything... I mainly didn't want Trigon >> >> to put work into it or think e could just grab it, because of exactly >> >> what you said, I assumed you were putting work in already. >> >> >> >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> >>> I'd appreciate if you would at least waiit because I have already >> >>> embarked on clearing the back log. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 10/22/2017 03:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >>>> I should say I'm a bit nervous with someone who hasn't been an >> >>>> Officer >> >>>> before starting with rulekeepor. It's an unholy blend of a lot of >> >>>> work, >> >>>> in big bursts, with timeliness being a big issue, and it requires >> >>>> some >> >>>> pretty finicky understanding of the rules (e.g. it's the primary >> >>>> person >> >>>> responsible for whether proposal amendments work, requiring knowledge >> >>>> of >> >>>> standards for clarity, AI/power, etc.) I think the position is >> >>>> historically the biggest source of officer burn-out even among >> >>>> experienced players. (I think almost *all* rulekeepor changeovers >> >>>> have >> >>>> happened when the rulekeepor just gave up on it for a month or more). >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm not saying "100% don't", but forewarned is forearmed... >> >>>> >> >>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Josh T wrote: >> >>>>> You can do as you intended, making the "if it is still possible" >> >>>>> clause in PSS' pledge >> >>>>> false, thus alleviating eir duty to become Rulekeepor. Think of it >> >>>>> as "if you don't do it, >> >>>>> they will". >> >>>>> 天火狐 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 22 October 2017 at 10:44, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> Oh. Then it's PSS' responsibility now and not mine? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Trigon >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Oct 22, 2017 8:40 AM, "Alexis Hunt" <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> That was only an intent; you haven't actually done it yet. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 10:34 Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> Are people still not getting my messages? It's in a thread >> >>>>> with the title "Deputising for the rulekeepor". >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Trigon >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Oct 22, 2017 8:31 AM, "Alexis Hunt" <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Huh? When? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017, 10:26 Reuben Staley, >> >>>>> <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> I don't think it's possible, as I have already deputized for >> >>>>> rulekeepor. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Trigon >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Oct 22, 2017 5:42 AM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" >> >>>>> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> I pledge to deputize for the rulekeepor on October 19, 2017, >> >>>>> if it is >> >>>>> still possible. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 10/22/2017 12:14 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: >> >>>>> > Huh, you're right, I could have sworn I saw them there... >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Rulekeepor is definitely out of date on SLRs; anyone could >> >>>>> deputise >> >>>>> > for it with appropriate notice. They could also start an >> >>>>> election, >> >>>>> > perhaps with a campaign pledge to reinstate CFJ >> >>>>> annotations? >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 00:13 Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au >> >>>>>> <mailto:j...@iinet.net.au>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I mean... I had noticed :P and the ADoP office itself being >> >>>>>> in >> >>>>>> confusion >> >>>>>> is really troubling... >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On 2017-10-22 15:10, VJ Rada wrote: >> >>>>>> > The FLR hasn't had them in a long time: certainly not since >> >>>>>> I've >> >>>>>> been >> >>>>>> > a player. I think Gaelan took them out. >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > JDGA: I'm ironically not sure what you can deputize for >> >>>>>> because I'm >> >>>>>> > late on my ADoP report (and am no longer ADoP) but I think >> >>>>>> it >> >>>>>> might be >> >>>>>> > just rulekeepor? o hasn't posted in about a week (I've kind >> >>>>>> of >> >>>>>> missed >> >>>>>> > him already haha) so it seems likely that he might miss >> >>>>>> this week's >> >>>>>> > report but it would take another week for you to deputize. >> >>>>>> Rulekeepor >> >>>>>> > I think you can next week but not this week (or next month >> >>>>>> because >> >>>>>> > Gaelan updated the FLR last month but forgot to file it as >> >>>>>> a >> >>>>>> report). >> >>>>>> > I think every other office is OK? >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > And regarding the uploading: I certainly haven't uploaded >> >>>>>> my >> >>>>>> weeklies >> >>>>>> > to the website and nobody's really noticed. I think none of >> >>>>>> them are >> >>>>>> > really in date rip. Except, obviously, uploading the >> >>>>>> ruleset is >> >>>>>> > important. >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Alexis Hunt >> >>>>>> <aler...@gmail.com >> >>>>>> <mailto:aler...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 at 23:54 VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com >> >>>>>> <mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >>> We really need to bring back rule annotations for >> >>>>>> important CFJs. >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> The FLR has them, although I do not know if Gaelan has >> >>>>>> been >> >>>>>> keeping them up >> >>>>>> >> to date. >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?2909 is >> >>>>>> the >> >>>>>> original >> >>>>>> >> precedent that I'm aware of (fun fact: "Wooble is a >> >>>>>> player" may >> >>>>>> be the >> >>>>>> >> single most common CFJ text of all time). >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Trigon
-- >From V.J. Rada
