Depitizing for rulekeepor entails taking the office over (unless you resign after of course). I think we'd all appreciate the short term work but it's one of the hardest jobs to do on an ongoing basis.
That said, was the last election ever resolved? I see VJ initiated it on September 14 but can't find the resolution. On Sun, Oct 22, 2017, 15:57 Reuben Staley, <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: > (Oh gosh. What have I gotten myself into?) > > I don't understand the significance of your message. What should I wait > to do? Do you mean I shouldn't work on the ruleset? > > On 10/22/2017 1:50 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > Not you specifically, primarily Trigon, but really anyone who wanted it. > > > > > > On 10/22/2017 03:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> > >> (was this meant to be just to me?) I'm not planning on doing anything > >> myself to start an election or anything... I mainly didn't want Trigon > >> to put work into it or think e could just grab it, because of exactly > >> what you said, I assumed you were putting work in already. > >> > >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > >>> I'd appreciate if you would at least waiit because I have already > >>> embarked on clearing the back log. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 10/22/2017 03:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >>>> I should say I'm a bit nervous with someone who hasn't been an Officer > >>>> before starting with rulekeepor. It's an unholy blend of a lot of > work, > >>>> in big bursts, with timeliness being a big issue, and it requires some > >>>> pretty finicky understanding of the rules (e.g. it's the primary > person > >>>> responsible for whether proposal amendments work, requiring knowledge > of > >>>> standards for clarity, AI/power, etc.) I think the position is > >>>> historically the biggest source of officer burn-out even among > >>>> experienced players. (I think almost *all* rulekeepor changeovers > have > >>>> happened when the rulekeepor just gave up on it for a month or more). > >>>> > >>>> I'm not saying "100% don't", but forewarned is forearmed... > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Josh T wrote: > >>>>> You can do as you intended, making the "if it is still possible" > clause in PSS' pledge > >>>>> false, thus alleviating eir duty to become Rulekeepor. Think of it > as "if you don't do it, > >>>>> they will". > >>>>> 天火狐 > >>>>> > >>>>> On 22 October 2017 at 10:44, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>> Oh. Then it's PSS' responsibility now and not mine? > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Trigon > >>>>> > >>>>> On Oct 22, 2017 8:40 AM, "Alexis Hunt" <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> That was only an intent; you haven't actually done it yet. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 10:34 Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>> Are people still not getting my messages? It's in a thread > with the title "Deputising for the rulekeepor". > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Trigon > >>>>> > >>>>> On Oct 22, 2017 8:31 AM, "Alexis Hunt" <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Huh? When? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017, 10:26 Reuben Staley, < > reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> I don't think it's possible, as I have already deputized for > rulekeepor. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Trigon > >>>>> > >>>>> On Oct 22, 2017 5:42 AM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> I pledge to deputize for the rulekeepor on October 19, 2017, > if it is > >>>>> still possible. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 10/22/2017 12:14 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > >>>>> > Huh, you're right, I could have sworn I saw them there... > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Rulekeepor is definitely out of date on SLRs; anyone could > deputise > >>>>> > for it with appropriate notice. They could also start an > election, > >>>>> > perhaps with a campaign pledge to reinstate CFJ annotations? > >>>>> > > >>>>> > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 00:13 Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au > >>>>>> <mailto:j...@iinet.net.au>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I mean... I had noticed :P and the ADoP office itself being in > >>>>>> confusion > >>>>>> is really troubling... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2017-10-22 15:10, VJ Rada wrote: > >>>>>> > The FLR hasn't had them in a long time: certainly not since > I've > >>>>>> been > >>>>>> > a player. I think Gaelan took them out. > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > JDGA: I'm ironically not sure what you can deputize for > because I'm > >>>>>> > late on my ADoP report (and am no longer ADoP) but I think > it > >>>>>> might be > >>>>>> > just rulekeepor? o hasn't posted in about a week (I've kind > of > >>>>>> missed > >>>>>> > him already haha) so it seems likely that he might miss > this week's > >>>>>> > report but it would take another week for you to deputize. > >>>>>> Rulekeepor > >>>>>> > I think you can next week but not this week (or next month > because > >>>>>> > Gaelan updated the FLR last month but forgot to file it as a > >>>>>> report). > >>>>>> > I think every other office is OK? > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > And regarding the uploading: I certainly haven't uploaded my > >>>>>> weeklies > >>>>>> > to the website and nobody's really noticed. I think none of > them are > >>>>>> > really in date rip. Except, obviously, uploading the > ruleset is > >>>>>> > important. > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Alexis Hunt < > aler...@gmail.com > >>>>>> <mailto:aler...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>>> >> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 at 23:54 VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com > >>>>>> <mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>>> >>> We really need to bring back rule annotations for > important CFJs. > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> The FLR has them, although I do not know if Gaelan has been > >>>>>> keeping them up > >>>>>> >> to date. > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?2909 is > the > >>>>>> original > >>>>>> >> precedent that I'm aware of (fun fact: "Wooble is a > player" may > >>>>>> be the > >>>>>> >> single most common CFJ text of all time). > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > -- > Trigon >
