True, I suppose. I have a feeling "can by regulation" would probably allow regulations either by announcement or with notice, but that's not the end of the world.
-Aris On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 00:16 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: >> Again, voting for both this and contracts is a rather bad idea, >> because they conflict. This removes regulations, which contracts >> uses. > > The contracts proposal doesn't /need/ regulations for anything > fundamental, though. It'd be easy enough to amend them out if we decide > we don't want regulations, and "can by regulation" might even work via > the natural-language meaning (without needing any sort of ruleset-like > structure to formalize it). > > -- > ais523
