If supporting this message is allowable, I do so.
On 10/20/2017 08:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > I intend to destroy the universe with notice. > > -Aris > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I intend t win the game with two days' notice, as described in Proposal >> 7923. >> >> >> On 10/20/2017 06:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, Madeline wrote: >>>> I intend to win the game with two days' notice, in accordance with Rule >>>> 7923. >>>> (Does this really work before it's even a rule?) >>> Yes, but it's not Rule 7923 (that's the proposal), saying it was "Rule 7923" >>> instead of "as described in Proposal 7923" might make this announcement >>> wrong >>> enough to fail. >>> >>> It works because in Rule 1728, the requirements are worded backwards in >>> time; >>> the action works if the rules allow it *when you try to finish the action*, >>> provided you announced the intent a few days before - and the rule doesn't >>> care that the action wasn't possible those few days before when you >>> announced >>> the intent. >>> >>> -G. >>> >>> >>> >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
