I don't believe this effects the idea of ratifying the purchase of shinies, but I do believe it does effect his action. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:21 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > >> On Oct 2, 2017, at 6:42 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> TTttPF >> ---- >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 6:41 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I find CFJ 3561 TRUE. I concur with the caller's arguments that while he >>> was allowed to destroy the stamps, he was not capable of destroying the >>> stamps. >>> ---- >>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > Note that this has fairly far-reaching effects. I’ll account for it on next > week’s Secretary’s report, and note that the stamps info on this week’s > report is provisional. I don’t have the brainpower to correctly update the > record at this time. > > -o >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
