I do include a list of people deregistered by Writ of FAGE in the Monthly report because it does not say Registrar's report_s_, I interpreted this to fulfill the requirement. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 11:28 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
>
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 10:17 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I Point a Finger at Publius Scribonius Scholasticus alleging that, as
>> Registrar, e has committed the Class-2 Crime of Tardiness by not reporting
>> last week on the players deregistered by Writ of Fage, as required by Rule
>> 1789.
>
> Neither of the two most recent unchallenged documents identified as a
> Registrar’s report contain the list required by rule 1789 ("Cantus Cygneus”):
>
>> The Player is deregistered as of the posting of the Writ, and the notation
>> in the Registrar's Report will ensure that, henceforth, all may know said
>> Player deregistered in a Writ of FAGE.
>
> The wording in this rule is unusual, but it appears to require that a
> deregistration by Writ of FAGE be recorded in the Registrar’s reports
> indefinitely. This is supported by language in rule 2143:
>
>> Any information defined by the rules as part of a person's report, without
>> specifying which one, is part of eir weekly report. Failure of a person to
>> perform any duty required of em within the allotted time is the Class-2
>> crime of Tardiness.
>
> The requirement for a “notation in the Registrar’s Report” clearly makes such
> a notation part of the Registrar’s report.
>
> I issue Publius Scribonius Scholasticus a green card by summary judgement for
> violating rule 2143.
>
> I believe I’m out of cards for the week, depending the results of V.J Rada’s
> CFJ.
>
> -o
>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
