On second thought, I don't think I really want the responsibilities of an office yet. I think I'll stay unemployed for now.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 3:26 PM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, everyone, for your answers. > > I'm not too interested in the Superintendent office, so I don't think I'll > go for that. > I could go for the Referee, since o said e wouldn't mind me taking it, but > I'm not really sure I want it either. > > One office that I could go for that doesn't seem too difficult is the > Tailor. If an election for it comes up, I'll definitely vote for myself. > (Or could I deputize for it? I still don't fully understand the > deputisation thing) > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> > On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> > >> > >> > * Voting to enter a CFJ into moot if there’s a serious doubt about the >> judgement (r. 911, rare), >> >> This has happened for the first time relatively recently and it has come >> up a few times since. >> >> > * Voting to win the game (r. 2482, rare), >> >> Something is supposed to be happening in regards to this >> >> > * Voting for a proposal author to win the Silver Quill for the year (r. >> 2444, rare). >> >> And this... >> >> ---- >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> > >
