Hrm. This is interesting. (If they're different) Would the verdict be what I intended the message to mean or the consensus on the interpretation of what I've written?
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > It's unclear to me if this is a statement of fact (whomever has the most > votes > *now*) or a conditional vote (whomever has the most votes at the end of the > voting period). If I had to guess, I'd go with the first one. > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > I vote for whoever has the most votes for each currently open office > election. > > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I endorse G. on the elections for Reportor and Herald. > > ---- > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > On Sep 6, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > >> For Reportor, I vote [PSS], followed by the list of people > provided by the incumbent. > > > > > > I retract my recent vote for myself for Reportor, and cast a > > > conditional vote: > > > > > > If PSS publishes a proto newspaper during the voting period, > [PSS]; > > > > > > otherwise, I vote for the list of players who publish a > proto-newspaper > > > during the voting period, in the order of publication [ie. > earliest > > > publisher first on list]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
