It's unclear to me if this is a statement of fact (whomever has the most votes *now*) or a conditional vote (whomever has the most votes at the end of the voting period). If I had to guess, I'd go with the first one.
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > I vote for whoever has the most votes for each currently open office election. > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I endorse G. on the elections for Reportor and Herald. > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Sep 6, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > >> For Reportor, I vote [PSS], followed by the list of people provided > by the incumbent. > > > > I retract my recent vote for myself for Reportor, and cast a > > conditional vote: > > > > If PSS publishes a proto newspaper during the voting period, [PSS]; > > > > otherwise, I vote for the list of players who publish a > proto-newspaper > > during the voting period, in the order of publication [ie. earliest > > publisher first on list]. > > > > > > > > > >
