On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:20 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > > Likewise, the fix for SHALLs is probably to make them only apply to > > officers, and have a neat list of all the relevant SHALLs in the rule > > defining the office. They serve an important role in preventing the > > game breaking, but they're the kind of thing that can easily trip up a > > new player if they apply to everyone. > > And also, the only really effective use of Cards currently IMO is if > someone needs to be removed from office. > > I think Card punishments short of this extreme should be turned into > Shiny fines. > My personal opinion on this whole business is that we should get rid of organizations (no one uses them), but shouldn't eliminate cards. Getting rid of all or most SHALLs/SHALL NOTs is also overkill. Our card system is pretty simple and rational at the moment. I would support the addition of discretionary fines with cards, and/or the addition of a card type whose sole penalty was a fine. -Aris
