On 07/18/2017 09:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:A person whose Vexity is zero may initiate a Call for Judgement by announcement. A person whose Vexity is not zero may initiate a Call for Judgement with N Agoran Support, where N is the value of that person's Vexity switch.The fact that there are circumstances in which a person CANNOT initiate a CFJ on eir own is pretty clearly a violation of R217, IMO. It's a direct Rules to the Contrary Notwithstanding requirement that a person be able to do this. Initiate to later have dismissed? Fine. Not able to initiate without another player's intervention? Not fine I would guess.
I've been wondering about this in the context of the economy overhaul: In it *players* need to use shinies or AP to initiate CFJs, but *persons* can do it for free if they aren't a player. Does that pass R217's bar [1]?
[1] "Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, any rule <http://agoranomic.org/ruleset/#Rule2141> change that would (1) prevent a person <http://agoranomic.org/ruleset/#Rule869> from initiating a formal process to resolve matters of controversy, in the reasonable expectation that the controversy will thereby be resolved; or (2) prevent a person from causing formal reconsideration of any judicial determination that e should be punished, is wholly void and without effect."
