>Auctions are a regulated action. They're specifically regulated by the >rules
Point me those rules then please lol, or say where and how exactly, as I have. >and even if they weren't, no sensical (shut up, it's a word now) >interpretation would allow you to auction things that another person >owns and then take them. I disagree, because the rules can clearly intend something, but their wording is faulty. For example, scams like Ais's withdrawing thing. I doubt the intent was to enable that (and if it was, then the secret motivations behind a certain rule change how they should be interpreted?). Where is the line drawn for what is acceptable to be "implicit" and what not? I believe not everyone has it at the same place, and there is a certain way to "draw" that line that allows my scam to work (although why this is is mostly just an educated guess based on opinions I've read). I just hope I'm at the right time and place for it. >The rules regulate ownership of things. Yes, the ownership of things, but not the state of being in an auction or not.
