> The previous provisions of this paragraph do not apply to an asset if the organization is required to provided that asset in order to continue existing.
I think there is a grammar mistake somewhere in that sentence, and if it exists it should be fixed. Aside from that, it looks OK. 天火狐 On 4 June 2017 at 01:52, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > This will be the last draft of this proposal before I submit it. > > -Aris > > Title: Assets v5 > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: o, nichdel > > Reenact rule 2166, Assets (Power = 2), with the following text: > > An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule (hereafter its backing > document), and existing solely because its backing document defines its > existence. > > Each asset has exactly one owner. If an asset would otherwise > lack an owner, it is owned by Agora. If an asset's backing document > restricts > its ownership to a class of entities, then that asset CANNOT be gained > by or > transferred to an entity outside that class, and is destroyed if it is > owned > by an entity outside that class (except for Agora, in which case any > player > CAN transfer or destroy it without objection). The restrictions in the > previous sentence are subject to modification by its backing document. > > Unless modified by an asset's backing document, ownership of an asset is > restricted to Agora, persons, and organizations. > > An organization's charter CAN specify whether or not that organization is > willing receive assets or a class of assets. Generally, an organization > CANNOT > be given assets its charter states that it is unwilling to receive. The > previous provisions of this paragraph do not apply to an asset if the > organization is required to provided that asset in order to continue > existing. > > > The recordkeepor of a class of assets is the entity (if any) > defined as such by, and bound by, its backing document. That > entity's report includes a list of all instances of that class > and their owners. This portion of that entity's report is > self-ratifying. > > An asset generally CAN be destroyed by its owner by > announcement, subject to modification by its backing document. > To "lose" an asset is to have it destroyed from one's > possession; to "revoke" an asset from an entity is to destroy it > from that entity's possession. > > An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. payed) by its owner to > another > entity by announcement, subject to modification by its backing > document. A fixed asset is one defined as such by its backing > document, and CANNOT be transferred; any other asset is liquid. > > A currency is a class of asset defined as such by its backing > document. Instances of a currency with the same owner are > fungible. > > The "x balance of an entity", where x is a currency, is the number of x > that > entity possesses. If a rule or proposal attempts to increase or decrease > the > balance of an entity without specifying a source or destination, then the > currency is created or destroyed. Where it resolves ambiguity, "Balance", > without any currency modifiers, refers to an entity's balance of > whichever > currency is designated as "Agora's official currency", if there is one. > > Assets are always public. [To provide for private contract based assets > later] > > Change the power of Rule 2166 to 3.0. > > Change the rule "Economics" to read in full: > > Shinies (sg. shiny) are a liquid currency, and the official currency of > Agora. > They may be owned by Agora, any player, or any organization. The > Secretary is > the recordkeepor for Shinies. > > The Secretary CAN cause Agora to pay any player or organization by > announcement if doing so is specified by a rule. > > Shinies cannot be destroyed, except as allowed by rules specifically > addressing the destruction of Shinies. Any otherwise successful > attempt to destroy Shinies instead transfers them to Agora. > > Amend Rule 2459, Organizations, by adding as a paragraph at the end: > > A member of an Organization CAN perform any action the rules authorize > that > Organization to perform, if the Organization's charter states that doing > so > is Appropriate. > > For the avoidance of doubt, all shinies existing under the old system > continue > to so under the new system, and if they would not otherwise do so, new > shinies > are created to replace them. > > > Amend the rule "The Surveyor" to have the folowing text: > > The Surveyor is an office, and the recordkeepor of estates. > > Amend the rule "Estates" to have the following text: > > An Estate is a type of liquid asset, which can be owned by players, > organizations, and Agora. The following changes are secured: > creating, modifying, or destroying an Estate; and causing an > entity to become an Estate or cease to be an Estate. > > Estates cannot be destroyed, except as allowed by rules specifically > addressing the destruction of Estates. Any otherwise successful attempt > to > destroy an Estate instead transfers it to Agora. > > Amend the rule "Estate Auctions" by changing the paragraph beginning > "During > an auction..." to read "During an auction, any player or organization may > bid > any number of Shinies by announcement." and removing the break between that > and the next paragraph. > > For the avoidance of doubt, all Estates existing under the old system > continue > to so under the new system, and if they would not otherwise do so, new > Estates > are created to replace them. >
