On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:28 PM Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 12:45 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > ============================== CFJ 3505 ============================== > > > > Can this statement have a Judge? > > > > ======================================================================== > > > > Caller: CuddleBeam > > > > Judge: Quazie > > Judgement: TRUE > > > > ======================================================================== > [snip] > > To Summarize: Though I have judged this CFJ, I believe that I was > > ineligible to be assigned to the CFJ by the reasonableness of the > > barring attempt. A reasonableness that comes from the fact that the > > barring itself isn't resolved until judge assignment, and all the > > information was at hand at that time, and thus no unreasonable > > obligations were placed on the Arbitor. > > ======================================================================== > > I'm not sure I agree with this reasoning (although I agree with the > verdict). > > To reduce ambiguity as to the status of this CFJ, I (attempt to) assign > it to myself, then judge it TRUE. > > -- > ais523 > I approve of this action.
