On Wed, 31 May 2017, Quazie wrote:
> Thus switches are regulated to being defined by the rules.
> 
> Thus switches can only be defined by the rules.
>
> Thus switches can't exist on Agencies and Organizations as the 
> rules don't define them to exist within those constructs.

In the old contract era, we used to have some rule that said definitions
within contracts (currencies, switches, etc.) generally follow some kind
of common-sense mapping to rules definitions (in terms of function, not
tracking).

> Thus the switches in question don't exist, or at least aren't switches.

They aren't *rules defined* switches.  They may be Agency-defined 
switches which might have a common-sense mapping (even if the above
contract rule no longer exists), or might have some tortured
relationship to the real-world definition of switch.

Just ideas for consideration here; I think your overall analysis is 
sound.

> Thus there are no switches for the Registrar to track.

This part in particular is spot-on.  However those other switches 
function (if they do), I think the Registrar tracking is only true for
rules-defined ones.



Reply via email to