Heads up: I'm unsure the implications of my eventual judgment (it's coming
soon) but the gist of the judgement is going to be:
By Rule 2162
{{{
A type of switch is a property that the rules define as a
switch, and specify the following:
}}}
Thus switches are regulated to being defined by the rules.
Thus switches can only be defined by the rules.
Thus switches can't exist on Agencies and Organizations as the rules don't
define them to exist within those constructs.
Thus the switches in question don't exist, or at least aren't switches.
Thus there are no switches for the Registrar to track.
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:19 PM Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 16:14 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
> > CFJ: "The Registrar must track any switches defined in Agencies or
> > Organizations."
>
> This is CFJ 3516. I assign it to Quazie.
>
> > Caller's arguments:
> > Rule 2139 states, "The Registrar is also responsible for tracking any
> > switches that would otherwise lack an officer to track them, unless the
> > switch is defined as untracked." Nowhere is this limited to rule-defined
> > switches and nowhere is it stated that non-rule-defined switches are
> > untracked.
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Note: the Superintendent does not need to, and isn't immediately
> > > interested in attempting to, track this or any switch embedded in an
> Agency.
> > >
> > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:14 caleb vines <grokag...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:50 AM, caleb vines <
> grokag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I just realized that this is an illegal action because I'm missing
> a
> > > > > list of agents. I withdraw the intent above and announce intent to
> > > > > establish the following Agency in 24 hours:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Name: grok's Favorite Player (gFP)
> > > > >
> > > > > Agents: All players
> > > > >
> > > > > Powers:
> > > > > 1) gFP has a single Name switch. gFP's Name switch can only be
> flipped
> > > > > by the Director of gFP. The legal values for the Name switch are
> the name
> > > > > of any single registered Player as defined by Rule 869. If the
> text of a
> > > > > player's name includes the words "deregister," "de-register,"
> "announce,"
> > > > > "intend," or any conjugation of or direct variation on those
> words, it is
> > > > > not a legal value.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) Once per Agoran week, if an agent either writes a Kind Message
> about
> > > > > grok in any public forum or gives grok 3 shinies, that agent may
> act on
> > > > > behalf of grok to flip gFP's Name switch to any legal position.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3) If a player that has never given grok a Trust Token gives grok a
> > > > > Trust Token, that player may act on behalf of grok to flip gFP's
> Name
> > > > > switch to any legal position once.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4) grok is the Director and Head of gFP.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -grok
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I perform the following three actions in order:
> > > >
> > > > I resolve my intent to establish gFP.
> > > >
> > > > I flip gFP's Name switch to "grok"
> > > >
> > > > I pledge that for the next two weeks, I will only flip gFP's name
> switch
> > > > if another player is acting on my behalf to do so.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -grok
>
> --
> ais523
> Arbitor
>
