> On May 16, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, 16 May 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Tue, 16 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >>> CFJ: G.'s heir switch is set to o. >> >> False, because only players CAN flip the heir switch, and I didn't. >> That part's not in question. > > ooh, actually it's possible that I lose the switch entirely, and the > shinies vanish? > > Agora, each player, and each organization have corresponding > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > switches known as Balance switches.
It is possible. I didn’t review that part of the original economics proposal very closely. The original intention was fairly clear to me: a player who has deregistered has three days in which to give _someone_ eir shinies, before the Secretary is obliged to transfer them to Agora. The rule text is more than a little shaky, though, and may not implement the intention perfectly. Personally, I don’t think the three-day window adds much. Someone who voluntarily deregisters can’t come back for thirty days, and someone who is deregistered for inactivity has been disregarding eir assets for at least a month prior to that. That’s why the draft I’ve got going right now causes the final asset transfer to happen immediately before the relevant entity transmutes into something else or ceases to exist: it’s simpler, and harder to have this kind of edge case in. I’m going to book-keep this as an uncleared transaction with a note about the CFJ, for now, and make any actions I take with these Shinies conditional on my actually having them. I’m very interested in seeing how the follow-up CFJ turns out, however. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
