On Tue, 16 May 2017, Quazie wrote: > NOTE: This CFJ will also apply to Roujo. There exists a judgement potential > that the Shinies were destroyed vs returned to Agora, and as a > result we may have also lost some number of Shinies from Roujo as well.
Yeah, I thought about calling this as a Motion to Reconsider CFJ 3481, since it would change the judge's logic if e also considered whether the switch existed in the first place! But as a non-player, I can't motion to reconsider.
