CFJ 1836 states that a self ratifying report does not ratify information it incidentally contains, particularly the list of players. The logic behind that is rather interesting, but anyways, it applies in this case.
-Aris On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > Interesting. Rule 869 says that “A registered person is a player” and > secures registration (with power=3). Rule 1551 (Ratification) has power 3.1, > so it’s actually possible that ratification could register someone. I don’t > think that’s desireable; if nothing else, someone made a player by > ratification hasn’t agreed to follow the rules, and there are some troubling > questions of consent. > > Any idea how to represent your indeterminate state in the reports? > > -o > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 2:13 AM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it needs to note that I supposedly became a player or once it self > ratifies it will make me a player regardless? (I might CFJ on that concept > of playership by ratification just to find out) > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 21:12 Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> >> The following is a DRAFT of the upcoming Referee’s report. The content >> makes some assumptions about Quazie’s ultimate fate. >> >> Suggestions encouraged! >> >> -o > >
